Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Get off the Camel

Ten years ago we tried to tell you, but you didn't listen. So let's try this again.

Over the last decade you have slowly begun to accept that something is wrong with our relationship. Your golf buddies from the recording industry have fallen on hard times, and your newspaper tycoon pals are hanging on for dear life. It’s getting ugly – really ugly. Captains of industry and robber barons everywhere are united in their despair and outrage at the prospect of having to sell their private jets and roughing it in first class. Oh, the humanity!

So how did we get in this mess? We had a deal … didn’t we? You produce and get rich, we consume and feel happy. Everybody wins! It worked so well for so long, what changed?

We’re glad you asked. We’ve been trying to tell you. Are you ready to listen? Great! Kick off your shoes and pull up a chair, we have a lot of catching up to do.

In a nutshell: we don’t like the way you’ve been playing games with our minds, so we took our ball and went to a different playground; it’s called the Internet, maybe you’ve heard of it?

After the Great War you were worried about overproduction, so you used Freud’s ideas to link your products to our selfish inner desires. With the help of Freud’s daughter and nephew you created a conformist society of docile consumers whose happiness depended on your products. You figured out how to make sure there would always be plenty of demand for your products – by programming the demand into the psyche of society.

Over the years we occasionally caught wind of your tactics, but you always managed to stay a step ahead. Like when we started to rebel against conformity in the 60’s and 70’s and you used VALS to make your products an expression of our individualism. We got to hand it to you; that was slick. Evil, but slick.

As time went on you grew bigger, richer, and ever more bureaucratic. Your priorities changed.

You got so good at marketing to us, so proficient at pulling our puppet strings that it didn’t even matter if the thing you were selling was a piece of crap, because you knew how to mindfuck us into buying it. You became so focused on cutting costs and maximizing profits that you completely forgot about us. We knew we had become just faceless consumer units to you, and deep down we were mad as hell about it, but by this point we were so isolated, weak, and selfish that all we could do was continue to eat/drink/shop/watch more TV to soothe our anger and depression.

And then something amazing happened. The Internet awoke something powerful in us and we started to connect and create in ways unimaginable even a few years before. BTW, we’re not talking about YOUR Internet. That thing reeked of everything we don’t like about you and the world is a better place for the bubble having burst in 2001. We’re talking about OUR internet; the one you think has a decimal place in its name.

We made this Internet. We made it for people, not business. We made it to keep in touch with our friends, to share pictures with family, to collaborate with strangers, and to be entertained by sharing the experience of living with other human beings. And by the way, we can also get all the news, video and music we need without leaving the Net.

Did we mention the average cost of things on the internet is free? There are things we are willing to pay for on the Net, but not often and not much. That’s how we like it, that’s how we intend to keep it. If you manage to ruin it (and we know you want to), we’ll just take our ball and look for a different playground again. 

What we love most about the Net is what you fear. The Net reconnected us to our humanity. We’re no longer as tame or predictable or polite as you would like, and we don’t understand why you think that’s a bad thing.

Buck up, it’s not all bad news for you. We still need the stuff you make, and you’re welcome to hang out on the Net with us anytime … you just have to learn some manners and show some respect if you want to sell to us.

We came up with a few tips to help you settle in.

You still don’t seem to understand what we mean when we say online markets are conversations. It’s simple: you can’t speak if you’re not willing to listen. When you do speak you will be held accountable for what you say.

You can’t psychoanalyze us to figure out which messages will make us buy your stuff anymore, because before we buy anything we can find out what thousands of your other customers are saying about you. If it’s bad we won’t buy your stuff and we’ll spread the word about how much your stuff sucks. If it’s good, same rule works to your advantage.


If your customer service is terrible, and despite all of our attempts to tell you that you need to fix it you still haven’t done anything about it, word will spread that your customer service sucks. If you put out advertising proclaiming your love for us and your dedication to customer service, word will spread that your customer service sucks and you lie. Online word of mouth spreads fast and it spreads far. Just ask Amazon or Dominos.

We’re offering you a second chance. Think of it as a return to the ancient markets. If you want to sell to us we want you to woo us. Listen to us and address our concerns. Act with integrity and stand behind your products. Build a solid reputation so we hear good things about you from other people. Even if you are big and rich, don’t act like a bully – act like a friend.

Welcome to the future. You're invited, but it's our world. Take your shoes off at the door. If you want to barter with us, get down off that camel!

[LATER] Check out the other CluetrainPlus10 posts by visiting the CluetrainPlus10 Wiki or Twitter search #cluetrainplus10.

Monday, April 27, 2009

Countdown to CluetrainPlus10

If you're planning on reading the CluetrainPlus10 posts tomorrow, you should read Doc Searls' post from last Friday first. It's a good intro to/review of what Cluetrain is all about, and what it isn't.

So, to set the record straight, “Markets are conversations” is a statement about markets. It’s about getting real. Not about getting talkative.

Of course, countless marketers have jumped on what they think is the clue train, and with lots of BS about “conversational” marketing. In the old days, we called this “sales”.

For what it’s worth (a lot, I hope), a 10th anniversary edition of Cluetrain is due out this summer. It’s the original with some more chapters added, including a couple by other folks who found Cluetrain useful. I hope it helps correct other misunderstandings as well.

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Walking the walk matters

In the mrweb article announcing the launch of MatterMeter, one of the principals is quoted as saying:
"MatterMeter is uniquely poised to listen to consumers."
This reminded me of thesis #24 from the Cluetrain Manifesto:
"Bombastic boasts - "We are positioned to become the preeminent provider of XYZ" - do not constitute a position."
Given how clued-in the MatterMeter concept is, and for a MR site it really is, this may be a rare case of a company that walks-the-walk better than they talk-the-talk ... which is a rare and commendable thing indeed.

BTW, the jury is still out on how much I matter. :)



Why are so many things broken?

Seth Godin explains why so many things are broken, and how to fix them. The first 4-5 categories he describes are spot on, the last couple are a little weak. Still, it's worth watching if you need a good laugh and overall it rings true. We all see these things happening in our companies and are probably guilty of doing them on occasion.

If you have ever awarded, or considered giving away prepaid credit cards as survey incentives pay close attention to what Seth says about them in the first two minutes. ***Spoiler alert*** They're broken!


Seth Godin at Gel 2006 from Gel Conference on Vimeo.

Saturday, April 18, 2009

Hat tip: GlobalTestMarket

Kudos to GlobalTestMarket for fixing their email display name.

Before:



Now:



Much better!

Friday, April 17, 2009

Don't start calling me optimistic but...

At the risk of ruining my reputation as a cynic, I have to admit I'm seeing some encouraging signs that there is a slight chance of positive change in the long term forecast.

I'm getting a lot less resistance when I talk about the importance of the user experience ... even when I suggest that the user experience should be what we spend the most time and money on. Some people are--gasp--even starting to agree that the online research experience should provide users with some kind of value (and this can NOT be money or points) BEFORE we ask them to do something research related. I even heard rumors that a friend of a friend heard a senior person in the company suggest that the research part of the website should become invisible or blend seamlessly into really cool websites that people actually want to visit.... *sniff*sniff*tear*.

All this on top of the love-fest and sense of community that resulted from Emiel Van Wegen's search for the best researchers on Twitter and ... well ... I think my heart grew three sizes this week. BTW Huge hat tip to Emiel; I think your post did more good in the MR world than you ever expected when you came up with the idea.

On the other hand I did attend a meeting earlier this week where a colleague called our respondents "lab rats" ... so we might not be out of the woods just yet.  :(

Wednesday, April 15, 2009

The machine is us/ing us

If you haven't seen it yet, definitely check out Mike Wesch's "Web 2.0" in just under 5 minutes.

Saturday, April 11, 2009

Mitch Joel: Hold off on Twitter - fix your website first

Great post from Mitch. Everything else you do on the Net (your blog, Twitter, etc.) is an extension of your website. When people want to know about you they will go to your website.

Most of the MR websites--corporate and panel sites--are poor at best. I can't even think of a good one to throw out as an example.

If you know of a really good MR site please post it in the comments or email me. I would love to update this post with some examples of what the rest of us should aspire to.

Friday, April 10, 2009

Fail me once, shame on you iD Factor; fail me twice...

It took me a while to figure out that the little cube thing at the bottom was what they were referring to when they said "click next." ... but eventually I did, and here is what happened when I clicked next.

Thursday, April 9, 2009

Wag of the finger: Ipsos i-Say

Dear Ipsos i-Say,

I just wanted to show you how long your last email was.

In addition to being way too long for me - or anybody else - to actually read it, there are a few other problems I would like to point out.

- don't call me "Dear i-Say Member." That's not my name.

- you seem to be confused about who you are. The email says it's from "Ipsos i-Say" but it's signed by Emily Martin.

- I know Emily Martin is about as real as Betty Crocker; the scan of the fake signature at the bottom isn't necessary - get rid of it.

- don't send me an email full of fine print. Give me the headlines and a link to the details.

- if you're emailing something important like login credentials ... and you actually expect me to see them, don't bury them in the middle of all that fine print.

Tuesday, April 7, 2009

No more mr. nice heretic

I'm pissed off and there is just no nice way to say this.

It seems like half the people I work with graduated with honors from the school of pass-the-buck, and the other half are incapable of getting anything done ... and at the same time paranoid that other people's accomplishments will expose them.

You behave like a swarm of flies circling a turd wrapped in flypaper. 

I don't want your job!
I'm not trying to get you fired!
If you're not going to help at least get the fuck out of my way!

end rant.